Californians Take Action: Datacenter Water & Power Dispute

Governor Newsom Takes a Stand on Datacenter Operations

California Governor Gavin Newsom has taken action by signing seven state bills that require datacenter operators to disclose more information about their operations and involve the community in plans for future locations.

Key Aspects of the Bills

The California Assembly Bills (AB) and Senate Bills (SB) that Newsom endorsed mandate greater transparency regarding water and electricity consumption, clarify financial responsibilities for grid connections, and establish regulations related to energy rates, water resources, and environmental assessments.

What’s Being Proposed?

The Bills and Their Sponsors

Senator Steve Padilla, involved in two of these initiatives, believes they’ll ensure datacenters contribute to costs associated with grid connections, electricity production, and increased expenses related to wildfire risks. The Governor’s office highlighted the previous administration’s neglect of concerns about AI and datacenters, indicating Newsom’s readiness to hold this prominent sector accountable in California.

Governor Newsom’s Remarks

“While the previous administration turned a blind eye, it’s the local communities that face the consequences — more energy demands, strained grids, water shortages, and environmental harm,” Newsom stated. “We are setting the stage for a better approach, proving once again that we don’t have to compromise Californians or jeopardize our health in the name of progress and success. California has already learned this lesson.”

Water Transparency and Beyond

Dr. Nathan Wangusi’s Insights

Dr. Nathan Wangusi from the water data transparency organization, Data Center Water Leaks, believes the new mandates could clarify how much water these large data facilities are using, assisting locals in understanding the effects on regional water resources, and preventing ratepayers from incurring additional expenses.

Bigger Issues and State Responses

AI, Labor, and Societal Issues

The necessity to oversee AI safety and the environmental effects of datacenters has been widely discussed. The White House has attempted to expedite datacenter developments through executive orders, and Trump himself argued against regulations. However, datacenters have caused friction with local communities, raising concerns about water consumption, noise, pollution, energy costs, and AI’s potential impact on jobs and society as a whole.

States Taking Initiative

The National Conference of State Legislatures reports that 16 states are considering bans on datacenter construction, and additional states are exploring various forms of regulation. Data Center Watch’s Q2 2026 report noted that “Thirty state legislatures introduced and many passed legislation, resolutions, or executive measures addressing datacenter siting, energy and water limitations, and shared infrastructure costs.” They estimate about 45 projects worth approximately $68 billion were canceled or postponed in the second quarter of 2026.

Newsom’s Change in Perspective

Previous Veto by Newsom

Last year, Newsom vetoed a datacenter water bill, AB 93, reportedly after discussions with tech industry leaders. In his statement [PDF] last October, he expressed, “…I am hesitant to impose strict reporting standards on this sector without grasping the overall impact on businesses and consumers of their technology.” However, his recent support implies that public dissatisfaction with datacenters has overcome lobbying pressures, and AI will be a contentious issue in the upcoming US midterms.

Signed, Sealed, Delivered

  • AB 1577 by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda). Data centers: reporting requirements.
  • AB 2383 by Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur (D-Hollywood). Electricity: data centers regulations.
  • AB 2469 by Assemblymember Diane Papan (D-San Mateo). Data centers: water consumption disclosures.
  • AB 2619 by Assemblymember Diane Papan (D-San Mateo). Water resources: datacenter regulations.
  • SB 886 by Senator Steve Padilla (D-San Diego) and Senator Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton). California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • SB 887 by Senator Steve Padilla (D-San Diego). California Environmental Quality Act: environmental leadership development projects: data centers: geothermal energy initiatives.
  • SB 1168 by Senator Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton). Data centers: Rate structures.

Summary: Datacenter Issues in California Heat Up

So, there it is, folks. California is taking a thorough look at datacenters and not ignoring the challenges posed by AI and water issues. Newsom is holding tech giants accountable, reminding them that while they may shape the digital landscape, they still have to follow the rules. Who would have thought datacenters would emerge as the new controversial topic?